Asrock Z490 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 208%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 229%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics211% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock Z490 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200511
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 13 '22 at 02:40
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900K-$370
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 97.1
1-Core 154
2-Core 308
102% 186 Pts
4-Core 561
8-Core 1,199
103% 880 Pts
64-Core 1,972
122% 1,972 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,135
Gigabyte(1458 4043) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 530.04
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
211% Outstanding
Lighting 311
Reflection 301
Parallax 327
253% 313 fps
MRender 354
Gravity 253
Splatting 189
208% 266 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 211%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$190
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 472 470 472 474 472 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 468
Mixed 379
SusWrite 472
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 39.3
136% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 292
238% 337 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 107%
Great: 136%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$130
3GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,403
Write 1,634
Mixed 1794
431% 1,944 MB/s
4K Read 50.4
4K Write 86.1
4K Mixed 61.4
201% 66 MB/s
DQ Read 634
DQ Write 437
DQ Mixed 565
414% 545 MB/s
Poor: 223% Great: 435%
Seagate ST12000VN0008-2JH101 12TB
270GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 126 127 126 128 126 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 107%
Seagate ST12000VN0008-2JH101 12TB
149GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 225 225 218 222 228 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 107%
Seagate ST14000VN0008-2JG101 14TB
856GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 133 135 131 135 133 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 2% Great: 104%
Seagate ST18000NE000-2YY101 18TB
8GB free
Firmware: EN01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 236
Write 235
Mixed 149
154% 207 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 1
1,888% 15.9 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 93%
Seagate ST12000VN0008-2JH101 12TB
1TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 130 132 128 132 129 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 107%
WDC WD10 0EFAX-68LHPN0 10TB
483GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 117
Write 128
Mixed 81.2
SusWrite 0.2
104% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.4
221% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 76%
ST12000V N0007-2GS116 12TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 214
Write 220
Mixed 175
SusWrite 0.2
194% 152 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.3
301% 9.9 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 88%
WDC WD80 EFZX-68UW8N0 8TB
7.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 169 170 168 168 160 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 168
Write 180
Mixed 88.7
SusWrite 162
201% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.3
116% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 67%
WDC WD80 EFZX-68UW8N0 8TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 164
Write 174
Mixed 86.7
SusWrite 0.2
132% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.2
112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 67%
WDC WD60 EFRX-68MYMN1 6TB
5.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 169 169 167 168 160 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 176
Write 169
Mixed 125
SusWrite 162
212% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
132% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M4C3600C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 42.1
MC Write 44.9
MC Mixed 33.9
115% 40.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 51.9
SC Mixed 27.7
96% 33.8 GB/s
Latency 49.8
80% 49.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 113%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z490 Taichi Builds (Compare 569 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 205%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 219%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z490 Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $1,598
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback