Gigabyte GA-H110M-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-A  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160307
Uptime10.3 Days
Run DateOct 19 '22 at 13:00
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 77%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6300-$44
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
68% Good
Memory 92
1-Core 90.1
2-Core 172
71% 118 Pts
4-Core 257
8-Core 257
34% 257 Pts
64-Core 275
17% 275 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
EVGA(3842 2739) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.87% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 1.2
0% 2.63 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 0.2
2% 3.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.87%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitach HTS727575A9E364 750GB
379GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JF4OA130
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 69 73 71 62 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 68.3
Write 80.7
Mixed 50.1
SusWrite 68.7
49% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 56%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
350GB free
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 106 106 107 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 98.1
Write 64.2
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 105
59% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Value DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
77.1% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 26
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 28.2
SC Mixed 23.3
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-A-CF Builds (Compare 1,654 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-A - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $304
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback