Gigabyte GA-B560M AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive43.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B560M AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220325
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateOct 30 '22 at 18:30
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400F-$101
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 75.7
1-Core 149
2-Core 284
91% 170 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 819
81% 663 Pts
64-Core 971
60% 971 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2782 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.47
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Lighting 146
Reflection 148
Parallax 139
119% 145 fps
MRender 126
Gravity 142
Splatting 123
106% 131 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 112%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY2 115GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 56 53 57 53 56 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 184
Write 73.1
Mixed 102
SusWrite 56.1
23% 104 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 23.1
91% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 76.4
DQ Mixed 84.5
68% 95.9 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 47%
IET VIRTUAL-DISK 500GB
7GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 74 73 75 69 67 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 77.1
Write 77.6
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 69.8
52% 70 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 4
651% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-2666C19-8GIS 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 34.7
MC Mixed 26.2
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 34.1
SC Mixed 25.7
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B560M AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 3,098 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B560M AORUS ELITE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $358
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback