QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics56.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateOct 31 '22 at 10:32
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 5220R
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 64.3
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 175
61% 109 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 604
57% 473 Pts
64-Core 575
36% 575 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 64%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Nvidia(10DE 13D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.6% Above average
Lighting 63.1
Reflection 84.6
Parallax 74.4
51% 74 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 76.6
Splatting 68.4
66% 83.5 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 76%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 429GB
328GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 103 104 107 107 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
24% Poor
Read 286
Write 107
Mixed 147
SusWrite 102
35% 160 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 5.1
21% 5.73 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x12GB
1 of 1 slots used
12GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
MC Read 39.9
MC Write 44.5
MC Mixed 35.6
114% 40 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 5.9
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback