Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M PRO-VH (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.94% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive234% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI A320M PRO-VH (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 01 '22 at 00:42
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$149
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 71.8
1-Core 100
2-Core 199
69% 124 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 701
66% 548 Pts
64-Core 997
62% 997 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000
Nvidia(10DE 0780) 2GB
CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 702 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 377.83
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
6.94% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 16.3
Parallax 3.1
6% 8.9 fps
MRender 15.8
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 10.2
9% 11 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.94%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM8FP6001T 1TB
623GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0828A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1353 1385 1408 1457 1436 1361 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
234% Outstanding
Read 1,818
Write 1,491
Mixed 1,110
SusWrite 1,400
326% 1,455 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 28
163% 62.4 MB/s
DQ Read 725
DQ Write 558
DQ Mixed 518
421% 600 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 234%
Great: 280%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
86.1% Excellent
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 28.1
90% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 24.9
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 97.2
41% 97.2 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M PRO-VH (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 382 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-VH (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback