Today's hottest deals

HP ProDesk 400 G2.5 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G2.5 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8105
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151103
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 01 '22 at 11:11
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590S-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
49.2% Average
Memory 51.7
1-Core 68.7
2-Core 153
50% 91.1 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 192
34% 239 Pts
64-Core 260
16% 260 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 8105) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
3.54% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 2
Parallax 5.1
4% 3.9 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.54%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
329GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.01H18
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 27.6
Write 44.1
Mixed 40.3
28% 37.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 69%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB
14GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 34.8
Write 5.7
Mixed 7
14% 15.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
25% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965432-082.A00LF Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.8% Below average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 14
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 10
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 400 G2.5 SFF Builds (Compare 279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G2.5 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback