Today's hottest deals

Asus A88XM-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.41% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive79.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus A88XM-A  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateNov 04 '22 at 03:50
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6600K APU-$88
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
48% Average
Memory 70.1
1-Core 63
2-Core 111
50% 81.3 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 164
21% 157 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 48%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Asus(1043 83F3) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
5.41% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 7.8
Parallax 8.9
6% 8 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 9.8
Splatting 0.3
4% 6.03 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.41%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415020RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 214 216 210 217 219 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 444
Write 353
Mixed 217
SusWrite 219
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 61.9
4K Mixed 35.2
119% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 196
160% 230 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
454GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 121 127 124 121 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 116
Write 110
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 124
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
36.8% Below average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 13.3
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 12.4
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88XM-A Builds (Compare 389 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-A - $122

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $235
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $274WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback