Today's hottest deals

HP ProDesk 400 G4 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive65.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G4 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82A2
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170609
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 05 '22 at 02:02
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$90
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 89.6
1-Core 101
2-Core 201
76% 130 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 291
39% 291 Pts
64-Core 298
18% 298 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 82A2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.29% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 6.4
Parallax 6.7
5% 6.27 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 9.2
6% 7.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.29%
Great: 6%
Nvidia Quadro K600
Nvidia(10DE 094B) 1GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 473.81
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.38% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 4.6
3% 4.57 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.38%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 480GB-$38
398GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900615
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 341 258 97 96 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 312
Write 156
Mixed 285
SusWrite 206
54% 240 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 42
4K Mixed 26.3
90% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 198
171% 251 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905702-426.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68% Good
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 22.1
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 25.6
SC Mixed 21.7
60% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 400 G4 SFF Builds (Compare 761 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G4 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $83
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback