Today's hottest deals

Intel Intel

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel Intel  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191009
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 06 '22 at 14:57
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4105
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
34.5% Below average
Memory 43
1-Core 49.4
2-Core 106
38% 66.1 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 153
20% 152 Pts
64-Core 157
10% 157 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Device(1E50 8003) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6813
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.99% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 2.1
2% 1.93 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4
3% 3.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.99%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asint AS606 512GB
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0712B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 277 189 11 102 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 456
Write 384
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 141
55% 249 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 9.8
4K Mixed 0.7
39% 10.8 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 11.9
DQ Mixed 0.6
29% 75.7 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 92%
Sandisk SD8TB8U256G1001 256GB
235GB free
Firmware: 8101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 188 195 200 199 195 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 313
Write 214
Mixed 193
SusWrite 200
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 29.3
4K Mixed 19.5
63% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 149
113% 152 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 92%
Turxun S 500 512GB
374GB free
Firmware: 8105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 4.8 4.4 6.3 6.2 5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.26% Terrible
Read 9.4
Write 9.5
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 5.4
6% 7.75 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 0.1 MB/s
SDXC Card 268GB
250GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 5 6.9 9.9 9.6 7.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 149
Write 0.5
Mixed 0.2
SusWrite 7.5
28% 39.2 MB/s
4K Read 140
4K Mixed 0
778% 69.9 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.8% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 9.2
25% 8.67 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 3.6
10% 3.6 GB/s
Latency 189
21% 189 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Intel Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel Intel

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback