Asus P8H61-M LE/CSM R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive34.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LE/CSM R2.0  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '17 at 05:23
Run Duration1107 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 93.8
1-Core 110
2-Core 212
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 546
57% 456 Pts
64-Core 549
34% 549 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203
Asus(1043 042A) 2GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 24% Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 64GB-$92
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0009 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.4% Below average
Read 234
Write 107
Mixed 147
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 40.4
4K Mixed 4.94
58% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 25.9
DQ Write 78.1
DQ Mixed 4.77
17% 36.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 65%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$48
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 132
Write 142
Mixed 108
95% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.02
4K Mixed 0.26
76% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 86%
ST310005 28AS 1TB
637GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 7.14
Write 26
Mixed 28.2
31% 20.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.33
64% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 46%
SanDisk Ultra 124GB
65GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
2.47% Terrible
Read 1.09
Write 0.96
Mixed 1.02
1% 1.02 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 0.62
4K Mixed 0.44
39% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 2.47%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
29.8% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.8
27% 9.53 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 6.6
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 60.2
66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LE/CSM R2.0 Builds (Compare 329 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LE/CSM R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $335
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback