Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive85.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '22 at 19:17
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 3000G-$52
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
49.8% Average
Memory 60.4
1-Core 100
2-Core 171
62% 110 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 255
31% 239 Pts
64-Core 255
16% 255 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
MSI(1462 7C52) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.44
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
5.33% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 7.8
5% 7.37 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 11.2
7% 7.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.33%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
S3SSDC120 120GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0414A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 403 407 415 414 417 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 454
Write 401
Mixed 395
SusWrite 407
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 20.7
115% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 89.8
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 32.8
76% 149 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD44G266681 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.8% Below average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 12.1
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 9.1
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 3,104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $274
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback