Dell Precision Tower 7910

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision Tower 7910
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 7910  (all builds)
Memory249.3 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170726
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '17 at 11:25
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 77.1
1-Core 90.3
2-Core 178
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 347
47% 349 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5200
Nvidia(10DE 1095) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 7.5GB, Driver: 385.8
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.4% Below average
Lighting 40.5
Reflection 40.5
Parallax 48.1
33% 43.1 fps
MRender 48.4
Gravity 42.4
Splatting 28.3
31% 39.7 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Avago MR9341-8i 480GB
252GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.65
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.6% Good
Read 485
Write 290
Mixed 301
79% 358 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 55.9
4K Mixed 11.4
81% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 26.8
DQ Write 74.2
DQ Mixed 12.6
20% 37.8 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 99%
Avago MR9341-8i 900GB
775GB free
Firmware: 4.65
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
98.8% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 173
Mixed 170
129% 172 MB/s
4K Read 1.12
4K Write 0.98
4K Mixed 0.65
136% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 99%
Avago MR9341-8i 900GB
309GB free
Firmware: 4.65
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
78.2% Very good
Read 135
Write 138
Mixed 137
103% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.92
4K Write 0.77
4K Mixed 0.43
100% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB Hynix HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF Hynix HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF M393A2G40DB0-CPB Hynix HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF Hynix HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF Hynix HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF Hynix... 256GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
119% Outstanding
MC Read 46
MC Write 43.5
MC Mixed 55
138% 48.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 16.9
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 7910 Builds (Compare 1,184 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback