Today's hottest deals

Asus Q550LF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 24 months ago.
SystemAsus Q550LF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q550LF
Memory4.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140113
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateNov 10 '22 at 01:02
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4500U-$393
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Memory 50.8
1-Core 27.1
2-Core 57.2
30% 45 Pts
4-Core 57.4
8-Core 77.6
8% 67.5 Pts
64-Core 71.2
4% 71.2 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Asus(1043 12DD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
2.15% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 7.7
Parallax 2.6
2% 4.3 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.3
2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.15%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
678GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR20002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 58 64 71 70 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 76.7
Write 61
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 66
44% 60.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
65% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BF160B.M16 Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 4.7
16% 5.43 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 3.4
10% 3.43 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q550LF Builds (Compare 198 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Q550LF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $473
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback