Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite C55D-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite C55D-A  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140127
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateNov 14 '22 at 17:56
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5200 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Memory 34.2
1-Core 20.5
2-Core 46.2
21% 33.6 Pts
4-Core 88.1
8-Core 62
11% 75.1 Pts
64-Core 88.7
6% 88.7 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3
Toshiba(1179 FA26) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
1.21% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 1.8
1% 1.87 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 2.4
2% 1.77 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.21%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-256L9S-11 2.5 7mm 256GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HC8110D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 155 195 178 211 201 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 285
Write 240
Mixed 196
SusWrite 198
52% 230 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 18.4
4K Mixed 11.9
46% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 63.6
68% 114 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 Kingston TSB16D3LS1KBG/4G 8GB
667, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.37 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 3.6
9% 3.27 GB/s
Latency 231
17% 231 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 18%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C55D-A Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C55D-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback