Today's hottest deals

HP 280 G1 MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 280 G1 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B34
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160601
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '22 at 19:00
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$120
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Memory 26.9
1-Core 85.9
2-Core 184
49% 98.9 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 244
32% 241 Pts
64-Core 237
15% 237 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
HP(103C 2B34) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
2.3% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 3.5
2% 2.53 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.1
3% 3.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.3%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 152 142 132 132 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 168
Write 153
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 141
90% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 103%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
6GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 5.9 5.4 5.3 5.6 5.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 252
Write 4
Mixed 2
SusWrite 5.4
46% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Mixed 0
254% 22.8 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
12.5% Very poor
MC Read 3.5
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 3.8
12% 4.33 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.37 GB/s
Latency 274
15% 274 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 280 G1 MT Builds (Compare 1,190 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 280 G1 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $171
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback