Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive49.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 17 '22 at 12:28
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 82
1-Core 129
2-Core 240
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 680
70% 564 Pts
64-Core 663
41% 663 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 3799) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Lighting 14.8
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 13.9
12% 12.4 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 16.3
Splatting 15
10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 134 86 86 106 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 414
Write 357
Mixed 293
SusWrite 117
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 34
4K Mixed 15.7
70% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 93.9
DQ Mixed 35.3
45% 81.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$30
931GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 187 185 183 183 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 216
Write 45.9
Mixed 87
SusWrite 184
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 115%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G30C15U4R.M8FE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
57% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 18.7
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 18.5
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 57%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,568 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback