Today's hottest deals

HP ProDesk 400 G6 MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G6 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8599
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220324
Uptime28 Days
Run DateNov 19 '22 at 00:51
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$223
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 65.1
1-Core 129
2-Core 258
80% 151 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 815
75% 628 Pts
64-Core 812
50% 812 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 8599) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
4.51% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 7.8
5% 7.5 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 0
4% 5.77 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.51%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GB
289GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 333 162 57 56 163 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 871
Write 771
Mixed 676
SusWrite 153
138% 618 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 48.3
4K Mixed 36.9
133% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 792
DQ Mixed 282
295% 468 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 110%
Great: 203%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
48.8% Average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.1
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 8.6
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 400 G6 MT Builds (Compare 471 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G6 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback