Today's hottest deals

Asus P8Z68-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '22 at 11:02
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$150
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 75.6
1-Core 37.4
2-Core 92.2
44% 68.4 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 436
40% 335 Pts
64-Core 468
29% 468 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Lighting 40.9
Reflection 39.2
Parallax 37.2
33% 39.1 fps
MRender 34.8
Gravity 40.4
Splatting 27
27% 34.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 179 156 123 143 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 304
Write 419
Mixed 334
SusWrite 155
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 31.4
4K Mixed 22.4
78% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 229
182% 254 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 124%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$150
61GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 193 190 185 199 152 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.9% Above average
Read 232
Write 206
Mixed 198
SusWrite 188
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 30.8
4K Mixed 22.8
77% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 195
144% 190 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 114%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$110
322GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 266 277 275 294 302 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 334
Write 308
Mixed 312
SusWrite 282
70% 309 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 27.2
4K Mixed 25.5
86% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 361
260% 332 MB/s
Poor: 210%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 429%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron CT102464BD160B.C16 04CD F3-1600C9-8GXM CT102464BD160B.C16 04CD F3-1600C9-8GXM 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.5% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 9.8
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V Builds (Compare 857 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $795
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback