Today's hottest deals

HP ProDesk 400 G5 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.89% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G5 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83F2
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180725
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 22 '22 at 14:30
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$148
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 47
1-Core 103
2-Core 177
59% 109 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 377
46% 352 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)
HP(103C 83F2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.8141
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
5.89% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 7.1
5% 6.63 fps
MRender 9.7
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 10.4
7% 8.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.89%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 298 289 289 317 385 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 815
Write 281
Mixed 350
SusWrite 326
98% 443 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 66.1
4K Mixed 28.4
114% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 412
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 175
178% 292 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 103%
Great: 164%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U9S8ME-8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.7% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 15
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 11.5
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 400 G5 SFF Builds (Compare 648 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G5 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback