Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO (WI-FI AC)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO (WI-FI AC)  (all builds)
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 23 '22 at 22:28
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$179
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Memory 95.3
1-Core 128
2-Core 224
86% 149 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 827
79% 650 Pts
64-Core 1,032
64% 1,032 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 148
Parallax 138
108% 140 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 141
Splatting 123
104% 128 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 EVO 1TB
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 161 111 102 103 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 461
Mixed 377
SusWrite 172
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 74.5
4K Mixed 46.9
157% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 242
212% 316 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 107%
Adata XPG SX8200 NVMe PCIe M.2 960GB-$185
873GB free
Firmware: SVN163 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1391 1433 1445 1483 1472 1483 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
265% Outstanding
Read 1,814
Write 1,162
Mixed 1,098
SusWrite 1,451
309% 1,382 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 71.9
223% 75.9 MB/s
DQ Read 844
DQ Write 672
DQ Mixed 732
555% 750 MB/s
Poor: 129%
This bench: 265%
Great: 354%
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
217GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 26 27 27 27 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 1.5
Write 1.5
Mixed 1.5
SusWrite 26.7
12% 7.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 178%
Samsung SSD 840 EVO 1TB
111GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 3.3 3.5 3.4 3.4 3.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
2.08% Terrible
Read 8.7
Write 21.4
Mixed 9
SusWrite 3.3
15% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
5% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.08%
Great: 168%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 39
MC Write 38.8
MC Mixed 29.7
102% 35.8 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 40.8
SC Mixed 28
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 56.3
71% 56.3 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 100%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS X HERO (WI-FI AC) Builds (Compare 4,074 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO (WI-FI AC) - $320

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $1,117
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback