Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H61-MX R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-MX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140620
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 25 '22 at 01:00
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 92.8
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 194
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 498
49% 399 Pts
64-Core 482
30% 482 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 Graphics
AMD(1002 0B0D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.Q4
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Lighting 35
Reflection 56.5
Parallax 54.1
28% 48.5 fps
MRender 57.9
Gravity 41.7
Splatting 41.9
38% 47.2 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,014
Write 4,102
Mixed 4,554
1,016% 4,557 MB/s
4K Read 302
4K Write 238
4K Mixed 261
917% 267 MB/s
DQ Read 733
DQ Write 489
DQ Mixed 608
454% 610 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 97%
Xstar 256GB 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: 2203XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 237 237 237 234 237 MB/s
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.7% Above average
Read 245
Write 225
Mixed 215
SusWrite 237
52% 230 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 27.1
92% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 77.2
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 128
99% 132 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 2133 C11 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
50.8% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.9
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 15.9
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-MX R2.0 Builds (Compare 762 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-MX R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback