Today's hottest deals

Asrock P55M Pro

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock P55M Pro  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '22 at 00:42
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 93
1-Core 96.3
2-Core 187
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 420
45% 358 Pts
64-Core 441
27% 441 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Device(7377 0000) 1GB
CLim: 930 MHz, MLim: 1055 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 28.9
Parallax 19.6
17% 23 fps
MRender 29.6
Gravity 23
Splatting 20.5
20% 24.4 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P3-256 256GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0329A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 239
Write 218
Mixed 32.2
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 18.8
4K Mixed 0.8
50% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 20.3
DQ Write 4.3
DQ Mixed 0.1
3% 8.23 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 98%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$15
203GB free
Firmware: SC13
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 79.9
Write 78.9
Mixed 49.3
52% 69.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
0, 0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.6% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 7.4
24% 8.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 9.9
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P55M Pro Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock P55M Pro

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback