Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion All-in-One 27-r0xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion All-in-One 27-r0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 838B
Memory6.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181211
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateNov 28 '22 at 19:01
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 78%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
47.9% Average
Memory 60.3
1-Core 41.9
2-Core 74.7
38% 59 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 432
36% 312 Pts
64-Core 439
27% 439 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 838B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7925
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
6.29% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 8.6
6% 7.03 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 11.2
7% 8.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.29%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane+932GBHDD 1TB
830GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 16.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 118 125 138 178 166 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 88%
Generic Flash Disk 2GB
2GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 3.5 4.1 4.4 4.1 4.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 1,244
Write 0.2
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 3.9
207% 313 MB/s
4K Read 72.7
4K Mixed 0
404% 36.3 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP24D4S7S8MBP-8 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
45.8% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 14.8
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 13.5
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion All-in-One 27-r0xx Builds (Compare 144 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion All-in-One 27-r0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $65
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback