Today's hottest deals

Supermicro Super Server

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro Super Server  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X11SAT
Memory19.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171020
Uptime15.1 Days
Run DateNov 29 '22 at 20:59
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v6
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 87
1-Core 119
2-Core 225
82% 144 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 616
63% 509 Pts
64-Core 601
37% 601 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P600
Nvidia(10DE 11BD) 2GB
CLim: 1620 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
15% Very poor
Lighting 19
Reflection 15
Parallax 16.1
16% 16.7 fps
MRender 18.9
Gravity 18.2
Splatting 15
14% 17.4 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$122
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,683
Write 1,181
Mixed 698
262% 1,187 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 79.5
4K Mixed 47.8
156% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 870
DQ Write 532
DQ Mixed 548
450% 650 MB/s
Poor: 159% Great: 353%
Seagate ST4000NM0035-1V4107 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: TN04
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 196
Write 194
Mixed 92.5
119% 161 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 1.2
265% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 115%
WD Elements 2621 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 117
Write 105
Mixed 71.8
120% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 0.8
263% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 62%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
110GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 80.2
Write 17.2
Mixed 59.8
59% 52.4 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.9
79% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965669-027.A00G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
79.1% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 25.2
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 31.1
SC Mixed 24
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Super Server Builds (Compare 764 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: Supermicro Super Server

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $596
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback