Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	58.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 1,768 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	61.3% Good	Memory 80.6 1-Core 78.7 2-Core 155 62% 105 Pts	4-Core 243 8-Core 255 33% 249 Pts	64-Core 285 18% 285 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000 13,526 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Nvidia(10DE 094C) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.30 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	7.06% Terrible	Lighting 8.1 Reflection 9.9 Parallax 11 7% 9.67 fps	MRender 11.7 Gravity 8.3 Splatting 9.4 8% 9.8 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.06% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 917GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 196 196 211 214 213 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	58.3% Above average	Read 219 Write 207 Mixed 195 SusWrite 204 46% 206 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 48.8 4K Mixed 33.5 110% 36.5 MB/s	DQ Read 34.4 DQ Write 86.5 DQ Mixed 45.9 39% 55.6 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT325U6EFR8C-PB 8x2GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 8 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	77.8% Very good	MC Read 29.7 MC Write 32.9 MC Mixed 28 86% 30.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 12 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 79.4 50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 95%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	240x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	220x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	94x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	73x
LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GBLiteonitBench 83%, 11,477 samples	53x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	44x

RAM
HMT451R7AFR8C-RD 4x4GBHynixBench 82%, 1,002 samples	168x
9JSF51272PZ-1G9E2 4x4GBMicronBench 82%, 908 samples	146x
HMT41GR7AFR4C-RD 4x8GBHynixBench 78%, 598 samples	87x

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $373