Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS II  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220511
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateDec 11 '22 at 20:55
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Memory 71.4
1-Core 161
2-Core 321
97% 184 Pts
4-Core 611
8-Core 895
94% 753 Pts
64-Core 1,015
63% 1,015 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 8809) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.02
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Lighting 21.1
Reflection 21.1
Parallax 29.2
17% 23.8 fps
MRender 16.1
Gravity 23.8
Splatting 21.5
17% 20.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$95
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 608ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 162 143 131 155 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 212
Write 199
Mixed 212
SusWrite 148
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 87.5
4K Mixed 40.4
132% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 177
148% 213 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Asgard VMA45UG-MEC1U2AW2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.3% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 21.2
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 21.2
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 98.2
41% 98.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS II Builds (Compare 301 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback