Asus M2N68 Plus

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M2N68 Plus  (all builds)
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100610
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 10 '17 at 19:20
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User LVA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+-$150
AM2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Memory 93.2
1-Core 25.9
2-Core 55.2
43% 58.1 Pts
4-Core 59.2
8-Core 51.1
8% 55.2 Pts
64-Core 60.5
4% 60.5 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 36E2) 1GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.62
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Lighting 21.9
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 19.3
18% 19.2 fps
MRender 24.5
Gravity 20.7
Splatting 16.9
16% 20.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor 6 L120M0 123GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BACE
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 34.6
Write 31.6
Mixed 34.8
25% 33.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.03
4K Write 0.53
4K Mixed 0.14
27% 0.24 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
MC Read 4
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.27 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 3.7
11% 3.83 GB/s
Latency 61.7
65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2N68 Plus Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M2N68 Plus

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback