Gigabyte GA-X99-UD5 WIFI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics71% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-UD5 WIFI-CF  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 17 '22 at 17:21
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2697 V4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
61.9% Good
Memory 72.8
1-Core 73.2
2-Core 146
57% 97.2 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 482
46% 379 Pts
64-Core 1,543
96% 1,543 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2602 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71% Very good
Lighting 128
Reflection 127
Parallax 35.4
104% 96.8 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 11.9
Splatting 8.9
6% 7.03 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 71%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 307 262 256 245 234 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 479
Write 454
Mixed 420
SusWrite 290
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 38.6
125% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 309
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 276
210% 283 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 133%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 14 14 15 13 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.1% Very poor
Read 51.5
Write 12.4
Mixed 16.4
SusWrite 13.4
17% 23.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
246% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 93%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 35GB
30GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 34 32 34 35 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 138
Mixed 36.2
SusWrite 34.5
44% 59.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 139%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 55.9
MC Write 50.9
MC Mixed 40.6
140% 49.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 15.2
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 95
42% 95 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 120%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X99-UD5 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-UD5 WIFI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $410
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback