Today's hottest deals

Asrock N68C-GS FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock N68C-GS FX  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '17 at 04:20
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
35.9% Below average
Memory 58.7
1-Core 38.8
2-Core 74.1
37% 57.2 Pts
4-Core 80
8-Core 74.8
10% 77.4 Pts
64-Core 67
4% 67 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GSO
Gainward(10B0 0801) 384MB
Ram: 384MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
5.16% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 7.58
Parallax 2.47
6% 5.72 fps
MRender 4.14
Gravity 5.47
Splatting 4.78
4% 4.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.16%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asmt 2115 250GB
213GB free
Firmware: 0
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 20.9
Write 20.3
Mixed 20.4
16% 20.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.36
4K Write 3.38
4K Mixed 0.01
204% 2.25 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 39%
Hitachi HDS728080PLAT20 82GB-$65
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PF2OA2AA Max speed: UDMA 133 133 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
27.7% Poor
Read 50.2
Write 46.1
Mixed 36.2
33% 44.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.21
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.17
54% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR2 800G 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2 266 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
MC Read 3.4
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 3.3
10% 3.33 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 2.8
9% 3.17 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68C-GS FX Builds (Compare 159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-GS FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $115
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback