Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X58-USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X58-USB3  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 18 '15 at 22:25
Run Duration407 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5540
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 87.6
1-Core 85.4
2-Core 171
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 327
43% 325 Pts
64-Core 322
20% 322 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350
EVGA(3842 1570) 1.2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5906
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
20.5% Poor
Lighting 24.5
Reflection 37.3
Parallax 27.5
20% 29.8 fps
MRender 33.6
Gravity 19.8
Splatting 25.9
22% 26.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$239
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.6% Below average
Read 258
Write 66.9
Mixed 92.4
30% 139 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 52.8
4K Mixed 10.9
79% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 26.5
DQ Write 87.1
DQ Mixed 11.4
22% 41.7 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 85%
GB1000EAMYC 1TB
31GB free
Firmware: HPG2 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 80.2
Write 73.7
Mixed 62
54% 72 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 2.03
4K Mixed 0.32
99% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 63%
GB1000EAMYC 1TB
27GB free
Firmware: HPG2 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 112
Write 94.1
Mixed 91.4
74% 99 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 2.25
4K Mixed 0.45
120% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 63%
SanDisk Cruzer 8GB
3GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 17.6
Write 3.4
Mixed 5.1
8% 8.71 MB/s
4K Read 4.76
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.47
136% 2.74 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 6 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
33.2% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 9.3
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 10.5
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X58-USB3 Builds (Compare 382 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58-USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $321
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback