Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-AB350M-DS3H V2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics62.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive25.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte AB350M-DS3H V2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350M-DS3H V2-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 07 '23 at 17:47
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600-$118
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 89.9
1-Core 160
2-Core 322
103% 191 Pts
4-Core 640
8-Core 949
99% 794 Pts
64-Core 1,125
70% 1,125 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 105%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
Asus(1043 8769) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
62.4% Good
Lighting 81.5
Reflection 81.3
Parallax 77.3
66% 80 fps
MRender 64.3
Gravity 75.3
Splatting 61.8
54% 67.1 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Colorful SL500 240GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0506A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 38 29 55 9.5 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
25.4% Poor
Read 342
Write 362
Mixed 10
SusWrite 37.7
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.3
36% 9.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$30
223GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 140 140 140 140 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 159
Write 169
Mixed 84.7
SusWrite 141
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
MC Read 39.2
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 33.4
91% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 28.6
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 34.4
81% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350M-DS3H V2-CF Builds (Compare 1,228 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350M-DS3H V2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $315
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback