Asus M4A87TD EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M4A87TD EVO  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110308
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '15 at 07:59
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 86.5
1-Core 51.4
2-Core 102
52% 80.1 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 202
27% 202 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 5400
Sapphire(174B 6000) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 9.12.0.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.17% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 1.92
Parallax 1.62
1% 1.64 fps
MRender 1.95
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.87
1% 1.55 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.17%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM04B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 401
Write 187
Mixed 150
54% 246 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 17.3
105% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 35
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 19.5
31% 55.6 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 110%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
89GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 89.4
Write 96.3
Mixed 66.6
63% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.3
89% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 69%
Maxtor 6L200S0 204GB
11GB free
Firmware: BACE1G10 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 34.2
Write 35.9
Mixed 29.2
25% 33.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 3.74
4K Mixed 0.1
99% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-10666CL7-2GBRH0 F3-10666CL7-2GBRH0 4GB
533, 533 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
34.2% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 11.8
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 9
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A87TD EVO Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $241
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback