Today's hottest deals

HP Z640 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z640 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 212A
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210521
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 11 '23 at 14:35
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Memory 92.1
1-Core 119
2-Core 241
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 726
75% 602 Pts
64-Core 924
57% 924 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia T600
Nvidia(10DE 1488) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.1% Poor
Lighting 34.3
Reflection 43.2
Parallax 32.5
28% 36.7 fps
MRender 49.9
Gravity 30.1
Splatting 36.3
31% 38.8 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 30%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 10 Volume 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 299 312 340 229 328 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 349
Write 240
Mixed 97.3
SusWrite 302
179% 247 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1.5
352% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 187%
Great: 234%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GR7MFR4N-TF Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB HMA41GR7MFR4N-TF 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 39
MC Write 45.7
MC Mixed 35.8
115% 40.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 19.2
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z640 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,667 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP Z640 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 16% - Very poor Total price: $509
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback