Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 208%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 233%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics209% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive231% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory20.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '23 at 19:03
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$245
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 77.8
1-Core 175
2-Core 335
104% 196 Pts
4-Core 674
8-Core 1,250
115% 962 Pts
64-Core 2,174
134% 2,174 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 102%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,000
EVGA(3842 3985) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
209% Outstanding
Lighting 318
Reflection 282
Parallax 282
259% 294 fps
MRender 282
Gravity 256
Splatting 183
191% 240 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 209%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SX8100NP 2TB
392GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VB421D57
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 423 439 430 404 317 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
231% Outstanding
Read 2,488
Write 494
Mixed 885
SusWrite 410
232% 1069 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 69.4
228% 80.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,225
DQ Write 369
DQ Mixed 773
576% 789 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 231%
Great: 340%
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB
853GB free
Firmware: 234140WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2166 2062 1997 2251 2169 2281 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
334% Outstanding
Read 2,444
Write 1830
Mixed 2,058
SusWrite 2,154
477% 2,122 MB/s
4K Read 51.4
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 40.4
192% 69.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,118
DQ Write 1,023
DQ Mixed 1,198
864% 1,113 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 334%
Great: 469%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 21.5TB
18.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 96.2
Write 149
Mixed 12.4
19% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 18.9
4K Mixed 1.7
16% 7.77 MB/s
DQ Read 4.9
DQ Write 48.7
DQ Mixed 0.1
8% 17.9 MB/s
Microsoft Storage Space Device 33TB
789GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 161 172 155 164 173 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 134
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 166
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 97%
Hitachi HDN 726060ALE614 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 122
Write 219
Mixed 75.9
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
83.3% Excellent
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 28.1
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 25.9
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,128 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,012
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback