Today's hottest deals

Blade Shadow Computer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics144% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemBlade Shadow Computer  (all builds)
MotherboardBlade ShadowM
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '23 at 21:28
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7543P 32-Core
CPU1 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
55% Above average
Memory 55.6
1-Core 53.4
2-Core 175
50% 94.8 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 330
42% 321 Pts
64-Core 452
28% 452 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 55%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A4500
Nvidia(10DE 163C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 20GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
144% Outstanding
Lighting 196
Reflection 192
Parallax 226
160% 205 fps
MRender 245
Gravity 151
Splatting 155
147% 184 fps
Poor: 133%
This bench: 144%
Great: 155%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 275GB
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 82 74 75 75 72 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 492
Mixed 302
SusWrite 76.1
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 74.4
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 62.2
228% 68 MB/s
DQ Read 440
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 119
142% 255 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%
Qemu HARDDISK 550GB
512GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 119 119 119 119 119 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Blade 7MT3FXXRS6EM5D-2EW 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
104% Outstanding
MC Read 46
MC Write 34.6
MC Mixed 39.3
114% 40 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 22.2
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Shadow Computer Builds (Compare 632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Blade Shadow Computer

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback