Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '23 at 16:47
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User TUN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 73.7
1-Core 111
2-Core 224
75% 136 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 681
65% 538 Pts
64-Core 856
53% 856 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.Q4
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.8% Average
Lighting 62.3
Reflection 64
Parallax 81.1
51% 69.1 fps
MRender 65.8
Gravity 67.5
Splatting 47.1
48% 60.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SX8100NP 256GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VB421D57
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 10 48 83 72 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 157
Write 354
Mixed 493
SusWrite 85.8
62% 272 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 93.7
4K Mixed 58.3
127% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 663
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 183
210% 372 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 75%
Great: 274%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
423GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 73 72 74 73 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 65.8
Write 80.6
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 73.1
50% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
82% Excellent
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 28.3
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 22.2
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 93.1
43% 93.1 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 82%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,586 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback