Supermicro X9DAi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSupermicro X9DAi  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DAi
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 22 '23 at 18:07
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 77.5
1-Core 76.1
2-Core 154
61% 103 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 661
60% 506 Pts
64-Core 1710
106% 1710 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 142
Parallax 127
108% 134 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 138
Splatting 119
101% 124 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2941
Write 2,304
Mixed 2689
589% 2,645 MB/s
4K Read 78.2
4K Write 57.1
4K Mixed 46.6
208% 60.6 MB/s
DQ Read 461
DQ Write 378
DQ Mixed 405
307% 415 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
65GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 291 292 291 292 292 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 420
Write 420
Mixed 370
SusWrite 309
86% 380 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 37.4
4K Mixed 31.3
101% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 319
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 287
217% 292 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
440GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 92 94 86 97 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 101
Write 61.2
Mixed 81
SusWrite 90.9
62% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
164% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 EBJ40EG8BFWB- Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.5% Very good
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 27.3
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 7.5
25% 8.6 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9DAi Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier

System: Supermicro X9DAi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $240
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback