Today's hottest deals

Asrock H410M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive52.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H410M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200810
Uptime12.4 Days
Run DateJan 23 '23 at 23:56
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$123
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
40.4% Average
Memory 53.3
1-Core 23.5
2-Core 57.1
30% 44.6 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 342
28% 245 Pts
64-Core 945
58% 945 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
ASRock(1849 9BC5) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9415
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.75% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 6.8
5% 6.97 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 6
Splatting 11.1
7% 8.33 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.75%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GSSD360S 256GB
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0226A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 281 247 283 286 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 378
Write 261
Mixed 179
SusWrite 269
61% 272 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 29.5
4K Mixed 9.6
49% 17.7 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 76.6
76% 122 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 82%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51
102GB free
Firmware: UF400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 128 135 128 138 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 383
Write 334
Mixed 196
SusWrite 159
60% 268 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 15.1
4K Mixed 5.7
36% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 34.9
47% 84.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 55%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
96GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 39 40 40 39 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14.6% Very poor
Read 50.8
Write 39.2
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 39.2
10% 42.1 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 9.5
33% 9.2 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD M378A5244CB0-CRC 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39.5% Below average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 13.1
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 7.9
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H410M-HDV Builds (Compare 880 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H410M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $314
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback