Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z370M D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive48.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
21 months ago, 19 months ago.
SystemGigabyte Z370M D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370M D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180403
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateJan 27 '23 at 08:44
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$135
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 86.1
1-Core 129
2-Core 253
86% 156 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 772
75% 616 Pts
64-Core 926
57% 926 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
14% Very poor
Lighting 17.4
Reflection 21.9
Parallax 17.7
14% 19 fps
MRender 15.4
Gravity 18.3
Splatting 16.3
14% 16.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ430400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 73 19 18 27 20 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 439
Write 382
Mixed 325
SusWrite 73
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 36.8
4K Mixed 15.8
72% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 96.8
DQ Mixed 35.5
46% 82.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 55%
CT3002SC 2TB
778GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 79 79 81 72 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 46.7
Write 84
Mixed 41.4
SusWrite 79.9
46% 63 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
76% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 76%
HP USB Flash Drive 64GB
15GB free, PID 2002
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 5.3 7 4.1 6.8 4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
1.84% Terrible
Read 1.5
Write 0.5
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 5.5
3% 2.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
5% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.84%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.1% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 9.3
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 10.8
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370M D3H-CF Builds (Compare 1,470 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370M D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $369
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback