Gigabyte GA-P55M-UD2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P55M-UD2  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 19 '17 at 08:40
Run Duration98 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 80.8
2-Core 159
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 398
42% 335 Pts
64-Core 398
25% 398 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 120GB-$45
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O0803B5a Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.3% Below average
Read 204
Write 48.4
Mixed 68
23% 107 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 24.2
4K Mixed 2.72
69% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 40.8
DQ Write 29.4
DQ Mixed 13.1
16% 27.8 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 91%
WL320GSA854 320GB
61GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 79.3
Write 77.6
Mixed 35.2
47% 64 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.88
4K Mixed 0.42
106% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.5% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 6.9
22% 7.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 9.3
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P55M-UD2 Builds (Compare 317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55M-UD2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback