Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	48.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Memory 82.8 1-Core 96.3 2-Core 194 72% 125 Pts	4-Core 348 8-Core 509 54% 429 Pts	64-Core 519 32% 519 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.96 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.5% Average	Lighting 56.4 Reflection 58.3 Parallax 50.6 46% 55.1 fps	MRender 66.9 Gravity 69.3 Splatting 61.2 53% 65.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 60%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SDVPSA1910512 512GB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 275GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0326A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 75 72 74 76 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	Read 340 Write 58.4 Mixed 28.7 SusWrite 61.8 26% 122 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 16 4K Mixed 0.7 40% 12.3 MB/s	DQ Read 138 DQ Write 14.4 DQ Mixed 22.9 30% 58.3 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Team-Elite-1600 2x8GB 3,520 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	MC Read 19.9 MC Write 21.3 MC Mixed 16.5 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 18.6 SC Mixed 16.4 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 75.4 53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	279x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	172x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	128x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	61x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	57x
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 44,086 samples	28x

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $334