Lenovo 90DD00E1US

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 90DD00E1US  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '23 at 07:28
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$299
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 123
2-Core 233
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 398
52% 392 Pts
64-Core 385
24% 385 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 92%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$50
858GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1028 967 982 979 975 983 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1,701
Write 1,509
Mixed 1,591
SusWrite 986
325% 1,447 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 53.9
173% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 71.2
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 95.9
82% 116 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 188%
Great: 410%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GVKB Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 04CD F4-3200C16-8GVKB Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 32GB
2133, 2400, 2133, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.7% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 21.6
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 19.7
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 90DD00E1US Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 75%

System: Lenovo 90DD00E1US

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $699
The Best.
Intel Core i5-13600K $316Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12600K $215Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $397Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $140Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $800Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $54G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback