Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics33.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory26GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 26GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory23.2 GB free of 26 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '23 at 21:19
Run Duration88 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5570
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 14 cores, 14 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
44.4% Average
Memory 35
1-Core 78.7
2-Core 148
46% 87.4 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 490
47% 389 Pts
64-Core 698
43% 698 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6400
Sapphire(1DA2 E458) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.9% Below average
Lighting 38.7
Reflection 49.9
Parallax 70.5
32% 53 fps
MRender 84.2
Gravity 42
Splatting 25.4
38% 50.5 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 39%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 74GB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 180
Write 101
Mixed 128
103% 136 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 4
850% 5.1 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 26GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 10240 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
37.8% Below average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 12.9
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 9
22% 7.67 GB/s
Latency 227
18% 227 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 157%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 618 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback