Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-790FXTA-UD5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-790FXTA-UD5  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1776 x 1000 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101015
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateNov 23 '17 at 14:31
Run Duration307 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 970
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 86
1-Core 55.1
2-Core 110
54% 83.7 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 218
29% 219 Pts
64-Core 221
14% 221 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6970
Sapphire(174B E182) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
23.1% Poor
Lighting 28.8
Reflection 24.8
Parallax 27.7
23% 27.1 fps
MRender 23.4
Gravity 26.3
Splatting 30.5
22% 26.7 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$150
769GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC1H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 112
Write 103
Mixed 92.5
77% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.37
4K Mixed 0.41
91% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST332031 1CS 320GB
274GB free
Firmware: SC13 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 89.5
Write 91.6
Mixed 77.8
65% 86.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.38
94% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 52%
Great: 51%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
229GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 64.1
Write 62.3
Mixed 57.5
46% 61.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 0.35
4K Mixed 0.15
44% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 47%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
181GB free
Firmware: CR10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Read 36.2
Write 65.5
Mixed 59.8
41% 53.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.17
4K Mixed 0.34
78% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 44%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
165GB free
Firmware: JP2O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 114
Write 118
Mixed 108
85% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.43
4K Mixed 0.35
84% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 74%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$57
148GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 87.8
Write 83.3
Mixed 85.1
64% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 2.01
4K Mixed 0.34
103% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 60%
Maxtor S TM3160812AS 160GB
10GB free
Firmware: 3.AA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Read 39.6
Write 42.7
Mixed 39.1
30% 40.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.03
4K Mixed 0.26
68% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 32%
Maxtor OneTouch III 320GB
103GB free, PID 7201
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 27.3
Write 24.9
Mixed 25.8
33% 26 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.05
4K Mixed 0.3
48% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
34.8% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 13.1
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 9.3
22% 7.87 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-790FXTA-UD5 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-790FXTA-UD5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $388
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback