Today's hottest deals

Lenovo F0EX0072TX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemLenovo F0EX0072TX  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 371D
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '23 at 08:47
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Memory 40.2
1-Core 77.5
2-Core 126
45% 81.1 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 152
20% 151 Pts
64-Core 148
9% 148 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 371D) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 20.10.44.07
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
3.79% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 5.1
3% 5.13 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 9.1
5% 5.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.79%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ128HBHQ-000L1 128GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9L1QFXV7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 94 82 113 117 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 590
Write 145
Mixed 193
SusWrite 109
56% 259 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 36.5
4K Mixed 20.8
73% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 180
133% 178 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 171%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.4% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 8.4
21% 7.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 2.2
10% 3.57 GB/s
Latency 201
20% 201 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F0EX0072TX Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo F0EX0072TX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback