Today's hottest deals

Sony VPCF22L1E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemSony VPCF22L1E  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '23 at 09:38
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
48.5% Average
Memory 72.1
1-Core 63.5
2-Core 109
51% 81.6 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 151
20% 148 Pts
64-Core 152
9% 152 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 540M
Sony(104D 9089) 1GB
CLim: 672 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 382.05
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
3.49% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 1.9
4% 3.97 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 3.1
3% 4.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.49%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK5065GSXN 500GB
269GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GB001H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 37 27 26 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 27.4
Write 30
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 30.2
19% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 40%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 59.5
Write 22.7
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 27.5
40% 33.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
54% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
48.9% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 14.4
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 96.6
41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VPCF22L1E Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Sony VPCF22L1E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $245
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback