Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FJ_A509FJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FJ_A509FJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X509FJ
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190430
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '23 at 12:44
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Memory 63.2
1-Core 10.9
2-Core 19.1
26% 31.1 Pts
4-Core 47
8-Core 56.3
7% 51.7 Pts
64-Core 274
17% 274 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 11AF) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
2.12% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 14.6
Parallax 3.4
2% 6.6 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 9.3
Splatting 0.1
3% 4.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.12%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$67
277GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 41 35 38 39 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 1,073
Write 820
Mixed 752
SusWrite 86.4
152% 683 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 64.8
4K Mixed 32.3
125% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 217
190% 283 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 100%
Great: 209%
XDISK X9 512GB
473GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 37 36 37 37 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 50.7
Write 40.2
Mixed 41
SusWrite 37.1
56% 42.2 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 12.2
4K Mixed 9.7
794% 11.7 MB/s
DQ Read 12
DQ Write 17.5
DQ Mixed 11.5
1,031% 13.7 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 221%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 7.4
20% 6.83 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 2.4
9% 3 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FJ_A509FJ Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FJ_A509FJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $67
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback