Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive42.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '23 at 21:17
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 62.1
1-Core 149
2-Core 252
83% 154 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 569
64% 504 Pts
64-Core 623
39% 623 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 0123) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Lighting 11.3
Reflection 12.2
Parallax 17.2
9% 13.6 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 12.9
Splatting 16.7
12% 13.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
FPT310M8SSD512G 512GB
265GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HAFEB2.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 352 328 389 394 383 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 184
Write 86.1
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 363
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 17.5
4K Mixed 10.1
42% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 14.6
DQ Write 15.5
DQ Mixed 14.7
11% 14.9 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 76%
Kingston SNV2S2000G 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SBK00104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1085 907 861 1027 1051 1049 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
224% Outstanding
Read 1873
Write 1,258
Mixed 1,278
SusWrite 996
302% 1,352 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 34.7
159% 62.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,117
DQ Write 717
DQ Mixed 807
631% 880 MB/s
Poor: 176%
This bench: 224%
Great: 402%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LD4AS008G-2666SC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
73.6% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 26.7
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 22.6
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 15,441 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback