Intel JSL MRD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIntel Jasper Lake Client Platform
MotherboardIntel JSL MRD  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220913
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '23 at 12:44
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5105
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
41.6% Average
Memory 43.8
1-Core 72.7
2-Core 144
47% 86.9 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 245
31% 234 Pts
64-Core 240
15% 240 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
3.55% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 4.8
4% 5.63 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 0.2
3% 4.23 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.55%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NS256GSSD340 256GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0823A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 352 374 354 366 354 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 466
Write 382
Mixed 399
SusWrite 355
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 22.8
118% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 38.1
90% 184 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 2x6GB
2 of 2 slots used
12GB Row of chips LPDDR4 3733 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (97th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.6% Above average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 20.6
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 13.7
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 186
22% 186 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical JSL MRD Builds (Compare 527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel JSL MRD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback