Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision T3600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive30% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
19 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemDell Precision T3600
MotherboardDell Precision T3600  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 01 '23 at 02:28
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 97%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 77.9
1-Core 35.7
2-Core 69.4
42% 61 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 181
19% 152 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro V4900-$150
AMD(1002 2B06) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
6.2% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 6.9
6% 7.73 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 7.7
6% 7.37 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.2%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 2TB
539GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 230 242 257 253 264 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30% Poor
Read 184
Write 76.5
Mixed 172
SusWrite 235
38% 167 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 8.3
4K Mixed 5.9
19% 6.3 MB/s
DQ Read 75.4
DQ Write 26.4
DQ Mixed 1.8
14% 34.5 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 30%
Great: 119%
Seagate ST10000NE0004-1ZF101 10TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: EN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 135 138 140 139 139 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 122
Write 126
Mixed 79
SusWrite 136
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.1
258% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 131%
WDC WD60 EFRX-68MYMN1 6TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0 0.1 0 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
8.68% Terrible
Read 53.7
Write 19
Mixed 21
SusWrite 0
25% 23.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.8
41% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 8.68%
Great: 71%
Samsung SSD 870 EVO 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 24 23 23 23 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.04% Terrible
Read 18.7
Write 20.1
Mixed 20.9
SusWrite 23.2
29% 20.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 2.5
105% 2.63 MB/s
Samsung SSD 850 PRO 1TB
146GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.7% Very poor
Read 51.2
Write 18.1
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 0.6
26% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 4
178% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 118%
WDC WD80 03FFBX-68B9AN0 8TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.3 4 3.8 4.2 4.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.9% Very poor
Read 59.1
Write 18.5
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 4.2
29% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1
51% 1.07 MB/s
ST8000VN 0022-2EL112 8TB
568GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0 0.1 0 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
9.09% Terrible
Read 54.4
Write 21.9
Mixed 21.4
SusWrite 0
26% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1
53% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.09%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix-00AD HMT325R7EFR8A-PB 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
63.8% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 24.5
72% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 5.8
19% 6.63 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T3600 Builds (Compare 2,971 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision T3600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback